Skip to main content
Back to Top

Don't forget dad: Addressing women's poverty by rethinking forced and outdated child support policies

Date Added to Library: 
Wednesday, April 25, 2018 - 18:25
Priority: 
normal
Individual Author: 
Hatcher, Daniel L.
Reference Type: 
Published Date: 
2012
Published Date (Text): 
2012
Publication: 
Journal of Gender, Social Policy and Law
Volume: 
20
Issue Number: 
4
Page Range: 
775-796
Year: 
2012
Language(s): 
Abstract: 

In the dialogues regarding reducing poverty among women, especially mothers, the inextricably linked issues surrounding low-income men must be simultaneously considered. In social policy addressing women’s poverty, poor fathers have too often been considered primarily as an enemy to be pursued rather than a fellow victim of poverty’s wrath, and potential partner towards the cure. We want someone to blame, and many assume that poor single mothers are best served by always being encouraged — and even forced — to pursue the noncustodial fathers for financial support through adversarial means. Mothers applying for public assistance are forced to sue the fathers for child support, with payments often owed to the government to reimburse the cost of the public assistance provided. Choices available to middle class and wealthy women are stolen from poor mothers, and dignity stripped from the fathers. The long outdated notions of bastardy acts, when single mothers were criminalized and forced into court to protect society from the burden of their illegitimate children, still exist. The potential for collaboration between low-income mothers and fathers can be severely hampered by the forced child support and paternity requirements, and polarization can result. This article considers how the harmful practices of the outdated bastardy acts still largely exist in today’s paternity and child support requirements, describes the development of the feminization of poverty construct, and how the gendered poverty discussion was unfortunately partly co-opted by the conservative anti-welfare movement and accompanying racialized stereotypes of the 1980s and 90s into an essentialist and often harmful response to women’s poverty. The Article concludes with a call for ending these harmful practices and embracing anti-essentialist approaches that recognize the linkages between poor mothers and fathers, value autonomy and self-determination, support coalition building, and provide opportunities for low-income parents to collaborate as partners in the struggle against poverty. (Author abstract)

Geographic Focus: 
Page Count: 
22
Share/Save

The SSRC is here to help you! Do you need more information on this record?

If you are unable to access the full-text of the article from the Public URL provided, please email our Librarians for assistance at ssrc@opressrc.org.

In addition to the information on this record provided by the SSRC, you may be able to use the following options to find an electronic copy from an online subscription service or your local library:

  • Worldcat to find an electronic copy from an online subscription service
  • Google Scholar to discover other full text options