Skip to main content
Back to Top

Do Alternative Base Periods increase Unemployment Insurance receipt among low-educated unemployed workers?

Date Added to Library: 
Friday, August 16, 2013 - 10:14
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 
10.1002/pam.21708
Priority: 
high
Individual Author: 
Gould-Werth, Alix
Shaefer, H. Luke
Reference Type: 
Published Date: 
Autumn 2013
Published Date (Text): 
Autumn 2013
Publication: 
Journal of Policy Analysis and Management
Original Publication: 
October 2012
Volume: 
32
Issue Number: 
4
Page Range: 
835-852
Year: 
2013
Language(s): 
Abstract: 

Unemployment Insurance (UI) is the major social insurance program that protects against lost earnings resulting from involuntary unemployment. Existing literature finds that low-earning unemployed workers experience difficulty accessing UI benefits. The most prominent policy reform designed to increase rates of monetary eligibility, and thus UI receipt, among these unemployed workers is the Alternative Base Period (ABP). In 2009, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act sought to increase use of the ABP, making ABP adoption a necessary precondition for states to receive their share of the $7 billion targeted at UI programs. By January 2013, 40 states and the District of Columbia had adopted the ABP despite the absence of an evaluation of ABP efficacy using nationally representative data. This study analyzes Current Population Survey data from 1987 to 2011 to assess the efficacy of the ABP in increasing UI receipt among low-educated unemployed workers. We used a natural-experiment design to capture the combined behavioral and mechanical effects of the policy change. We found no association between state-level ABP adoption and individual UI receipt for all unemployed workers. However, among part-time unemployed workers with less than a high school degree, adoption of the ABP was associated with a 2.8 percentage point increase in the probability of UI receipt. (author abstract)

This article is based on a working paper published by the National Poverty Center at the University of Michigan.

Target Populations: 
Geographic Focus: 
Page Count: 
18
Epub Date: 
07/19/2013
Share/Save

The SSRC is here to help you! Do you need more information on this record?

If you are unable to access the full-text of the article from the Public URL provided, please email our Librarians for assistance at ssrc@opressrc.org.

In addition to the information on this record provided by the SSRC, you may be able to use the following options to find an electronic copy from an online subscription service or your local library:

  • Worldcat to find an electronic copy from an online subscription service
  • Google Scholar to discover other full text options